Reimagining Counterspell

With a cruel gleam in the cold, baleful points of light that mark its eyes, the lich raises its hand. Sickly green light coalesces around its outstretched finger, casting long shadows that dance maniacally as the party leaps for cover from the imminent curse. All except the wizard, who waves his hand and cancels the spell.

Counterspell is one of the most popular abjuration spells and is practically a staple of any decent wizard’s spell list. It may use a slot that could otherwise have been expended to cast fireball or some other spectacular, flashy spell, and it may only be effective against certain types of enemies (spellcasters), but no other spell has singlehandedly saved as many parties from certain defeat or completely neutralized a player or enemy like counterspell has.

It’s also a spell that many players and Dungeon Masters wish had never been created, for those precise reasons.

In this article, we will examine common complaints about this spell and how it might be reimagined into something that is more engaging.

What Is Counterspell?

In Fifth Edition DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, counterspell is a 3rd-level spell that can be cast as a reaction when a spellcaster sees a creature casting a spell. If the level at which counterspell is cast is equal to or higher than the level of the spell it is countering, that spell is automatically negated. If the spell that would be countered is of higher level than the counterspell, the creature casting counterspell must succeed a spellcasting ability check to achieve this. Thus, a 3rd-level counterspell might, with a good roll, negate a 7th-level finger of death, an 8th-level sunburst, or even the mighty wish spell. Or the caster might whiff the check and waste a 3rd-level spell slot. Or the caster might, anticipating the enemy is casting a more powerful spell, use counterspell at a much higher slot level for no real extra benefit.

What’s Wrong With Counterspell?

Due to its potential to trivialize an encounter, counterspell either becomes the focus of a party’s strategy, or it becomes worse than useless. Many Dungeon Masters have complained about this spell after the ignoble murder of one of their spellcasting villains prompted them to only ever run enemy spellcasters in groups larger than the number of player characters with access to this spell, invariably leading to no spellcaster ever achieving anything on either side because the only spell that is ever successfully cast is counterspell. Turns are effectively wasted and frustrations rise because combat largely devolves into pointless sound and fury. It’s not even a nuclear deterrent; that would at least be more interesting because something would happen.

Regarding that last point, it is possible to use creative narration to flavour the counterspell in a conceptually impressive way, changing it from a sad trombone moment to an opportunity to engage your players’ imaginations—our friend over at Sly Flourish has an exceptional article all about this which we highly recommend you check out. However, nothing is still nothing, no matter how much of it there is and how creatively it’s presented, and for many people this is an insufficient solution.

Reimagining Counterspell

If you and your players are unsatisfied with the spell in its regular form, consider using this reimagined version from us here at Dungeon Master’s Workshop:

COUNTERSPELL
2nd-level abjuration

Casting Time: 1 reaction, which you take when you see a creature within 30 feet of you casting a spell
Range: 30 feet
Components: S
Duration: Instantaneous

You attempt to interrupt a creature in the process of casting a spell that is not this spell. Make a spellcasting ability check contested by the spellcasting ability check of the target. If you cast this spell using a spell slot higher than the triggering spell, you gain a +1 bonus to your check for each level this spell exceeds the triggering spell. If you succeed, the creature’s spell fails and has no effect, and the target creature takes 1d6 psychic damage.
If you roll a 20 on the d20 for your spellcasting ability check to negate a spell that targets only one creature (not an area), and the total of your check would exceed the total of the target creature’s check, you can instead cause the spell to be reflected back on that creature, using the slot level, spell save DC, attack bonus, and spellcasting ability of the caster.
If more than one creature casts this spell in response to the same trigger, only one caster (chosen by the one with the highest initiative) may make the ability check to negate the spell, and that creature has advantage on the roll.
At Higher Levels. When you cast this spell using a spell slot of 3rd level or higher, the damage increases by 1d6 for each slot level above 2nd.

There are a number of significant changes in this version of the spell. They are described below, along with the intentions behind the change.

  1. The automatic negation aspect is removed and replaced with a contested ability check that still rewards you for using a higher level spell slot.
  2. Reducing the range to 30 feet makes the strategy of using this spell inherently more risky.
  3. The addition of psychic damage causes the spell to have a meaningful effect on the game beyond burning one of your enemies’ spell slots at the cost of one of your own, and is some consolation if you cast counterspell at a much higher level than necessary.
  4. Escalating counter attempts are prohibited because the spell can’t be used to counter itself.
  5. Multiple attempts to counter the same spell are resolved simultaneously with a single check in a way that also makes initiative meaningful beyond the first round.
  6. The 5% chance to reflect a spell (9% chance with advantage) adds a dynamic element to the spell and allows for amazing spell duels between you and your foes.
  7. Dropping the spell level by 1 (to 2nd level) is appropriate given all the above changes, and encourages shenanigans with it because more NPCs will have access to it (it’s a tier 1 spell).

This version of the spell is much more engaging, with numerous mechanics that appeal to players who feel the regular version of the spell lacks tangible benefits to make up for its many potential convolutions. You would be hard pressed to call this spell boring.

Putting It All Together

Creative narration and clever encounter design can certainly go a long way to improving gameplay experience, even with mechanics some people find frustrating. Sometimes, however, certain features can pose a constant source of irritation, and you must look to alternatives to keep everyone happy. Any one of the changes above can significantly alter how counterspell plays out at your table. Try them out and see what works best!

Feature Image Credit:Counterspell” by Remi Roundtree


Would you like to share your thoughts on this spell and how it works at your table? We’d love to hear from you in the comments below!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *